|
<<
^
>>
Date: 2001-12-02
US: Auslands-Aufklaerung auch ohne Ausland
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
Weil's so schön war gleich nochmal: Nachdem der US Patriot Act im
Schnelldurchlauf durch diverse Entscheidungsgremien geboxt wurde,
verlangt die CIA mehr Rechte zum Bespitzeln im eigenen Land und dabei
ähnliche Befugnisse, wie sie dem FBI zustehen.
Gleichberechtigung, einmal anders. Der Rest bleibt wie gehabt:
"By removing the requirement of a foreign connection for a FISA
wiretap, the administration proposal would make it far easier to mount
surveillance on people who have no known connection to actors
overseas."
Wär ja auch noch schöner, wenn die einen dürften, aber die
anderen nicht...
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
Bush Team Seeks Broader Surveillance Powers
By Jim McGee Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, December 2, 2001; Page A25
The Bush administration is asking Congress for a second major
expansion of federal surveillance powers that legal experts say would
radically change laws that have long protected the rights of
Americans.
A Justice Department proposal would eliminate the chief legal
safeguard in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). A CIA
proposal seeks legal authority to gather telephone and Internet
records from domestic communication companies.
The still-secret proposals would build upon and expand new
intelligence-gathering powers that were granted to the FBI and the CIA
under the U.S.A. Patriot Act. Signed into law Oct. 26, that
anti-terrorism bill laid the foundation for a larger and more powerful
domestic intelligence-gathering system.
[...]
FISA wiretaps are considered especially sensitive because agents who
obtain them need not have any proof that crimes are being committed,
only probable cause that the target is working on behalf of the
foreign power or terrorists. By contrast, agents who wiretap suspected
mob figures or drug lords must show a judge persuasive evidence that
specific crimes are being committed.
By removing the requirement of a foreign connection for a FISA
wiretap, the administration proposal would make it far easier to mount
surveillance on people who have no known connection to actors
overseas.
"This amendment would fill a gap that has become increasingly apparent
since September 11," said the Justice Department proposal, because the
requirement to show a connection with a foreign power "limits the
ability of the President to use this statute against, for example,
hijackers or other terrorists without affiliation or known affiliation
with a specific group or foreign state."
The CIA's proposal would give the agency the same legal authority the
FBI now has to obtain information on foreign intelligence targets from
domestic telephone and Internet service providers.
The new proposals came at the invitation of the Senate and House
intelligence panels, which asked the agencies to submit technical
corrections to the anti-terrorism bill or suggest laws that would help
combat terrorism, according to an informed source.
[...]
The CIA asked for authority to force telephone and Internet service
providers to hand over without a court order information on foreign
intelligence targets living outside the United States who are not U.S.
citizens or legal residents.
The FBI already has this authority. Under the law, the CIA would have
the same authority if the CIA director declares "there is a
substantial likelihood that the communications of the target contain
intelligence information" relating to international terrorism.
"This is pretty audacious," said James X. Dempsey, a lawyer with the
Center for Democracy and Technology and an expert on the legal aspects
of electronic surveillance. "What they are asking for is the ability
to carry out e-mail interceptions without a court order, upon the
say-so of the director of central intelligence."
The proposed new authority for the CIA would be added to new powers
granted under the U.S.A. Patriot Act that gave the CIA access to
foreign intelligence information gathered by domestic grand juries,
wiretaps and criminal investigations conducted by the FBI and other
agencies.
A senior U.S. official said this second wave of anti-terrorism
measures reflects the administration's belief that it can harness the
political energy of wartime to gain even more power and autonomy for
federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
"A lot of this is not being driven by problems that prosecutors or
investigators are having," the official said. "It is just a good time
to get everything. It is totally politically and
public-perception-driven."
"It is turning FISA into a one-stop shop for wiretaps," said Jerry
Berman, a lawyer with the Center for Democracy and Technology who
participated in the original drafting of the FISA statute in 1979.
"Joe Six Pack thinks they [FISA wiretaps] are carefully targeted on
foreigners and terrorists."
(C) 2001 The Washington Post Company
Volltext:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A44003-2001Dec1
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
thnx to: (N.N.)@lo-res.org
relayed by: [email protected]
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
edited by Harkank
published on: 2001-12-02
comments to [email protected]
subscribe Newsletter
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
<<
^
>>
|
|
|
|